“President Bush on Monday defended the intelligence on which he based his decision to go to war with Iraq, saying it was `darn good,’”……what type of lying sack of shit characterizes completely fallacious information as being ‘darn good’??? or, rather, what type of an idiot believes this type of logical argument:
A. the fruits of espionage (intelligence) are judged to have the quality of “good” in measure proportional to their accuracy.
B. the intelligence supporting president bush’s stated reason for going to war, that is weapons of mass destruction, was known at that time to be false.
C. therefore, the intelligence on which he based his decision to go to war was ‘darn good’.
even if you allow that it was not known at that time that the intelligence was fraudulent, that argument sucks shit. and you’d still be lying.